Author Topic: Christine O'Donnell (Read 9310 times)

zerogravityfat · « **Reply #35 on:** October 21, 2010, 08:29:21 AM »

hopefully after the elections they will form a party so the conservatives can divide among themselves.

El Barto · « **Reply #36 on:** October 21, 2010, 08:42:15 AM »

It's really pretty much a re-branding. They're the same people, just marketed slightly different.

Adami · « **Reply #37 on:** October 21, 2010, 11:59:16 AM »

This is the first I've heard of Christine O'Donell, I was more familiar with her when she was known as Anne Coulter.

j · « **Reply #38 on:** October 21, 2010, 12:28:12 PM »

Quote from: Adami on October 21, 2010, 11:59:16 AM

This is the first I've heard of Christine O'Donell, I was more familiar with her when she was known as Anne Coulter.

Anne Coulter is (was? I haven't heard anything about her in awhile) much more of a total bitch, and I sincerely believe that she wants all "liberals" to die horrible, horrible deaths.

This chick is just plain dumb. Even against the low baseline set by the average politician.

-J

zerogravityfat · « **Reply #39 on:** October 21, 2010, 01:25:32 PM »

yea whatever happened to ann coulter? can we only have one cunt at a time? she morphed to palin, then that morphed to o'donnell

Cool Chris · « **Reply #40 on:** October 21, 2010, 02:09:00 PM »

Coulter just wanted to sell books. Saying outlandish things, whether or not you actually believe them, helps.

What I don’t understand is why these Palin/O’Donnell types can’t just stick with their local government. Palin was, what, governor of Alaska? Apparently Alaska functioned fine with her at the helm. At least I didn’t hear anything about her driving it in to the ground. So she was at least serviceable in that job function. Why do they need to aspire to bigger, and more unmanageable, things where they are more likely to suck?

El Barto · « **Reply #41 on:** October 21, 2010, 02:20:22 PM »

Palin was, I believe, having plenty of corruption allegations thrown her way. While Alaska was functional (insofar as Alaska can actually be functional), she did have issues. As for O'Donnell, she's never had local political experience. Her three tries for the senate have been her only political experience.

Chino · « **Reply #42 on:** October 27, 2010, 05:23:43 AM »

I can't stand Christine O'Donnell. I love how Bill Maher rips on her week after week.

El Barto · « **Reply #43 on:** October 29, 2010, 09:11:19 AM »

Man, this is pretty fucked up. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/2010/10/29/defends-odonnell-night-stand-story/

I don't like the girl, and I certainly disapprove of her being a tease, but throwing this out there is highly uncool. What an asshole.

hefdaddy42 · « **Reply #44 on:** October 29, 2010, 09:44:17 AM »

I agre that it's pretty low. I also think that if it's true, she's stupider than I thought, and I'm surprised it hadn't come up before now.

So, I doubt it's true.

El Barto · « **Reply #45 on:** October 29, 2010, 09:57:05 AM »

Quote from: hefdaddy42 on October 29, 2010, 09:44:17 AM

I agre that it's pretty low. I also think that if it's true, she's stupider than I thought, and I'm surprised it hadn't come up before now.

So, I doubt it's true.

It fits her personality perfectly. I'd buy it.

I just don't think that it's relevant or reflects poorly on her outside of being a tease.

PlaysLikeMyung · « **Reply #46 on:** October 29, 2010, 10:52:50 AM »

I like how O'Donnell blamed the Democrats even though it was a single person who published the story

Chino · « **Reply #47 on:** October 29, 2010, 02:34:30 PM »

As much as I dislike her, that is super lame.

EPICVIEW · « **Reply #48 on:** October 29, 2010, 02:38:02 PM »

I like her more then the guy she is running against.. she seems like a nice person..

El Barto · « **Reply #49 on:** October 29, 2010, 02:51:13 PM »

I kind of have to wonder if this thing wasn't orchestrated. Other than being a tease, she didn't do anything wrong, or necessarily hypocritical, so this is hardly a deal-breaker for her. However, the invasion of privacy is earning her a great deal of sympathy. Hell, even her competitor is sticking up for her. I bet this whole thing gets her a few points, and the worst thing that came of it is the knowledge that she doesn't shave her bush.

Chino · « **Reply #50 on:** October 29, 2010, 04:31:14 PM »

Quote from: El Barto on October 29, 2010, 02:51:13 PM

and the worst thing that came of it is the knowledge that she doesn't shave her bush.

Well, touching that region might lead to masturbation.

eric42434224 · « **Reply #51 on:** October 30, 2010, 01:36:02 PM »

Mmmmm....bearded clam.

Adami · « **Reply #52 on:** October 30, 2010, 01:37:42 PM »

Quote from: eric42434224 on October 30, 2010, 01:36:02 PM

Mmmmm....bearded clam.

Ew. I like my womans vagina like I like my 9 year olds vagina.

There's no punch line to that.

Vivace · « **Reply #53 on:** October 30, 2010, 01:55:39 PM »

Can I ask a stupid question? If a private school wants to teach Creationism what's stopping them? They are a private school and not a government run school. Don't these schools have a certain autonomy which gives them certain rights to teach what they wish to teach in school? I ask this because if not then how can we justify Catholic or Religious schools who should have the right to teach Religion in their schools without government interference as I would suspect a Catholic School told not to teach bible studies goes against the 1st Amendment.

GuineaPig · « **Reply #54 on:** October 30, 2010, 01:57:24 PM »

I don't think there's anything stopping them. Except common sense.

Adami · « **Reply #55 on:** October 30, 2010, 01:57:56 PM »

Quote from: Vivace on October 30, 2010, 01:55:39 PM

Can I ask a stupid question? If a private school wants to teach Creationism what's stopping them? They are a private school and not a government run school. Don't these schools have a certain autonomy which gives them certain rights to teach what they wish to teach in school? I ask this because if not then how can we justify Catholic or Religious schools who should have the right to teach Religion in their schools without government interference as I would suspect a Catholic School told not to teach bible studies goes against the 1st Amendment.

Private schools can do whatever they want.

eric42434224 · « **Reply #56 on:** October 30, 2010, 02:04:09 PM »

Quote from: GuineaPig on October 30, 2010, 01:57:24 PM

I don't think there's anything stopping them. Except common sense.

Tick · « **Reply #57 on:** October 30, 2010, 03:25:51 PM »

I think Christine O'Donnell has more talent then she is given credit for.

PlaysLikeMyung · « **Reply #58 on:** October 30, 2010, 03:43:29 PM »

nice

I hope Delaware isn't dumb enough to elect her though

Chino · « **Reply #59 on:** October 30, 2010, 04:27:55 PM »

Ugh

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZlbZl7vbLE

orcus116 · « **Reply #60 on:** October 30, 2010, 07:55:12 PM »

Quote from: tick on October 30, 2010, 03:25:51 PM

I think Christine O'Donnell has more talent then she is given credit for.

Tick · « **Reply #61 on:** October 30, 2010, 08:46:02 PM »

Quote from: orcus116 on October 30, 2010, 07:55:12 PM

Quote from: tick on October 30, 2010, 03:25:51 PM
I think Christine O'Donnell has more talent then she is given credit for.

the tard plus your avatar made your post hilarious!

hefdaddy42 · « **Reply #62 on:** October 30, 2010, 11:28:46 PM »

Quote from: Vivace on October 30, 2010, 01:55:39 PM

Can I ask a stupid question? If a private school wants to teach Creationism what's stopping them?

Nothing.

Nigerius Rex · « **Reply #63 on:** October 31, 2010, 04:41:24 AM »

Quote from: Chino on October 30, 2010, 04:27:55 PM

Ugh

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZlbZl7vbLE

Bill maher is more of a twat than she is.

Vivace · « **Reply #64 on:** October 31, 2010, 04:46:21 AM »

Quote from: Nigerius Rex on October 31, 2010, 04:41:24 AM

Quote from: Chino on October 30, 2010, 04:27:55 PM
Ugh

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wZlbZl7vbLE

Bill maher is more of a twat than she is.

This, but it doesn't matter. Her statement is just incredible.

ariich · « **Reply #65 on:** October 31, 2010, 07:07:22 AM »

Quote from: El Barto on October 29, 2010, 09:57:05 AM

I just don't think that it's relevant or reflects poorly on her outside of being a tease.

I agree. I also don't understand why NOW have made such a big deal about it, or how it degrades all women candidates.

El Barto · « **Reply #66 on:** October 31, 2010, 09:47:00 AM »

Quote from: ariich on October 31, 2010, 07:07:22 AM

Quote from: El Barto on October 29, 2010, 09:57:05 AM
I just don't think that it's relevant or reflects poorly on her outside of being a tease.
I agree. I also don't understand why NOW have made such a big deal about it, or how it degrades all women candidates.

They think, and I agree, that trying to paint somebody as slutty is out of line. If her date involved a goat or a troop of boy scouts, then it'd be relevant. All Gawker did was print details of a seemingly awkward date in an effort to make her look--well, I don't know what image they were shooting for.

ariich · « **Reply #67 on:** October 31, 2010, 10:38:19 AM »

Oh I agree with why it's out of line. I just don't see how it specifically degrades women. The same thing the other way round would have exactly the same problem, surely?

ehra · « **Reply #68 on:** October 31, 2010, 10:44:40 AM »

I doubt that there would be calls of man-whore or anything like that if a woman came out of the woodworks and said that, three years ago, she had a "one night stand" that didn't even end in sex with some male political candidate.

El Barto · « **Reply #69 on:** October 31, 2010, 10:50:11 AM »

I believe their concern is that a whole new line of attacking women candidates has emerged that doesn't exist with male candidates.

News: The staff at DTF wish to remind you all that a firm grasp of the rules of Yahtzee can save your life and the lives of your loved ones. Be safe out there.

Author Topic: Christine O'Donnell (Read 9310 times)